|Information Center|About Our Team|

Suffering an injury or illness as a result of a medical professional's negligence can be traumatic. Our attorneys offer more than 20 years of experience assisting clients. We focus our practice exclusively on medical malpractice lawsuits.

Utah’s Transvaginal Mesh Defect Attorneys

The Food and Drug Administration has warned that the use of transvaginal mesh exposes patients to a greater risk of complications than other methods of surgical vaginal repair. The FDAstated that in spite of the increased side effects risk, transvaginal mesh repair surgery carries no addition benefits compared to other surgeries.

Transvaginal mesh is a type of surgical mesh used for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI). After gynecologists began using surgical mesh to repair POP or SUI in the 1970s, manufacturers developed specially designed products for use in these surgeries.

Some of the most common forms of transvaginal mesh and their manufacturers are:

  • American Medical Systems: SPARC; BioArc; MiniArc; Elevate; Monarc; Perigee; In-Fast; Apogee.
  • Boston Scientific: AdvantageTM Sling System; Obtryx Curved Single; Obtryx Mesh Sling; Prefyx Mid UTM Mesh Sling System; Prefyx PPSTM System; Arise Pinnacle; Lynx; Solyx.
  • C.R. Bard: Avaulta PlusTM BioSynthetic Support; Avaulta Solo TM Synthetic Support; FasLata Allograft; Pelviocol Tissue; PelviSoft BioMesh; Pelvitex TM Polypropylene Mesh.
  • Johnson & Johnson: Ethicon TVD; Gynecare TVT; Gynecare Prosima; Gynecare Prolift; Gynemesh PS.

The FDA warning states that several frequent complications that have been linked to the use of transvaginal mesh, including vaginal mesh erosion, pain, infection, urinary problems, bleeding and organ perforation. The agency reported that since 2007, reports of surgical mesh complications have risen exponentially.

Recently, patients who have been injured by these dangerous products have filed hundreds of lawsuits against the manufacturers.  They are standing up against some of the most powerful corporations in the health care industry, and sending a message that business must stop putting patients over profits.  These lawsuits have helped women recover money for medical bills, future surgeries, and pain and suffering.

If you or a loved one received a transvaginal mesh during surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse and suffered complications from the device, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit. For a free legal evaluation, contact the defective medical device lawyers at  lawyers at G. Eric Nielson & Associates calling toll-free at 1-866-605-4556 and speaking to an actual attorney, not a call center or a paralegal.

Posted in Product Defects | Leave a comment

Jeffs v. West – Clarifying Utah Law

Today the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in Jeffs v. West; an article on the decision is available here.  It’s an interesting opinion about duties of professional care in medical malpractice cases.  The unanimous decision is likely to stir a lot of controversy, mostly because of the unfounded concern that, as reporter Melinda Rogers put it, it “could have a widespread effect on the number of malpractice lawsuits filed against healthcare providers.”

That concern is unfounded because, rather than creating a new theory of liability or a previously unrecognized cause of action, the opinion simply applies longstanding principles underlying “duty” to clarify an area of law that has become increasingly muddled.

“Duty” is but one of four elements that a plaintiff must prove in order to prevail in a negligence action (the others being breach, causation, and injury).  In today’s well-reasoned and well-researched opinion, the Utah Supreme Court clarified the factors that give rise to a duty.  All too often–by courts, lawyers, and laypeople alike–the four elements of negligence are conflated with one another.  This opinion simply held that under the traditional factors of a legal duty analysis, professionals owe third party non-patients a duty of care when prescribing harmful drugs.

That’s it.

It isn’t a big change in the law; it’s simply a clarification of existing law and the nature of professional duties of care.  This is the way it’s always been, and the Utah Supreme Court was simply reversing a lower court that got it wrong, largely because it had erroneously conflated causation issues with duty.  If anything, the clarification provided by the decision will reduce confusion among parties to lawsuits and help courts facilitate justice.

Posted in Current Events | Leave a comment

Malpractice Myths: You Reap What You Sow

The year is almost up, and so far, we’ve had over a hundred Texans contact us and looking for a lawyer to file a medical malpractice case for them in their home state.  We’re licensed and practice are in Utah…so why are they calling us?  Texas is a big place, so why can’t they find a lawyer to help them a little closer to home?

They tell us they’ve tried.  They say they’ve called dozens of Texas lawyers, but because of that state’s rigorous, pro-insurance “tort reform” measures, there are fewer and fewer lawyers who are able to help injury victims pursue justice.  Certainly, there are still plenty of attorneys in Texas, they’ve just shifted their focus to other areas of law.

I previously wrote that the real goal of so-called “medical malpractice reform” is not to decrease health care costs or improve the quality of medical care, it is to escape the consequences of negligence.  Once the attorneys are gone,  negligent physicians will be able to act with impunity; there will be no one to hold them accountable.

As you might expect, the rate of medical negligence in Texas is on the rise, but injured patients have little or no recourse.  Additionally, data shows that the new laws didn’t solve the “doctor shortage crisis” that lobbyists claimed.

Meanwhile, the State of Illinois held that damage caps were unconstitutional over two years ago.  And what’s the result?  Has there been an explosion of “frivolous” lawsuits?

Nope.

The facts won’t change the rallying cry of insurance companies and corporate healthcare lobbyists.  You can rest assured that with each upcoming legislative session, they will be trotting out the same, tired old myths in an effort to get politicians to take your rights away.

Ryan Springer

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

This time of year is important to all of us at G. Eric Nielson & Associates, as it probably is to most of you.  We’re very thankful to have the opportunity to represent so many fine people.  Our clients are the most important part of our practice, and are the reason we fight.

We’re grateful to be inspired by people who have been hurt through no fault of their own, but who are working through their injuries and setting examples for all of us.

We are also thankful to live in a country like the United States, where justice means something, and even the little guy gets a chance to stand up for what is right.

From all of us at G. Eric Nielson & Associates to all of you, we wish you a very Happy Thanksgiving!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Breast Cancer Awareness Ride

As a medical malpractice attorney, I have represented dozens of women and their families in cases involving delays in treatment for breast cancer.  Those cases have taught me about the courage of women facing this terrible disease, and that early detection and treatment are critical.

On a personal level, I have a mom, a wife, and a daughter.  Statistically speaking, breast cancer will affect at least one of them. That is why breast cancer awareness and support for research are important to me.  That’s one of the reasons why I encourage you to join me in this Saturday’s Breast Cancer Awareness Ride sponsored by the fine folks at Trek Bikes of American Fork.

You can register for the event right here (there are 25 mile and 10 mile options) and get more information from the Trek Bikes of American Fork web page.  This is an outstanding event, and in addition to being a great time, it’s an important cause.

Ryan Springer

Posted in Cancer | Leave a comment

The Right Lawyer for the Job

One of my first jobs was working construction with my dad during the summer.  Although he had a general contractor’s license, he really considered himself a finish carpenter–he was always good with details.  He taught me that even though he could probably figure out how to do the various jobs associated with building a home like the concrete work and the drywall, the overall project would be more successful if he let the specialists do their job while he did his.  “If it were my house,” he said, “I wouldn’t want the electrician putting in my plumbing.”

That was the first thing I thought of when I read the recent reports claiming that “Only 1 in 5 medical malpractice cases pay.”  The news reports refer to the conclusions from a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine analyzing malpractice risks by area of specialty.  Significantly, the authors found that contrary to popular belief, there are actually very few so-called “frivolous lawsuits” filed against doctors.  One of the study’s lead authors, Professor Amitabh Chandra, even said what I’ve known for years: given the time and expense of prosecuting a malpractice case, “a lawyer would have to be an idiot to take a frivolous case to court.

So if frivolous lawsuits aren’t really being filed in the first place, then why are so few cases successful?  I can’t help but think that many of those cases were not being filed by the right lawyer for the job.  Just as my dad wouldn’t build a house with an electrician installing the plumbing, people injured by medical negligence should be wary of hiring just any lawyer to handle a medical malpractice case.

At G. Eric Nielson & Associates, we don’t do divorces.  We don’t do bankruptcies.  We don’t practice criminal law.  Our practice focuses exclusively on medical malpractice.  These cases are among the most complicated forms of civil litigation.  The laws are complex, and so is the medicine involved.  You can’t afford to hire a lawyer that isn’t experienced in medical malpractice law with a demonstrated track record of success against the insurance companies and attorneys that defend negligent doctors and hospitals.  If you or a loved one have been injured by medical negligence, make sure you get the right lawyer for the job.  Call G. Eric Nielson & Associates at 801-424-9088 for a free, no obligation consultation today.  Don’t let your case be one of the many that are won by careless physicians and their insurance companies.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Killer Pain Killers: Prescription Drug Negligence

Today a jury found physician Dewey MacKay guilty of forty counts of illegal distribution.  This conviction follows the recent guilty pleas entered by two other Utah doctors, Warren Stack and Max Cannon.  The actions of these physicians were deemed to be not just negligent, but criminal.

All three of these doctors were dispensing powerful analgesic drugs–painkillers–in high amounts.  Analgesic drugs are commonly used to relieve pain. Some analgesics, such as aspirin and acetaminophen, are relatively mild and are available over the counter.

Other analgesics, however, are powerful narcotics, and are available only with a prescription. Some common prescription analgesics include morphine and codeine, which are naturally occurring opiates; hydrocodone (Vicodin and Lortab) and oxycodone (OxyContin and Percocet), which are semi-synthetic opioids; and fully synthetic opioids, such as Fentanyl and Methadone. Under the close supervision of health care providers, these drugs can play an important part of a patient’s pain management regimen.


Unfortunately, these drugs can also cause serious side effects, from nausea and constipation to respiratory arrest and even wrongful death. Additionally, due to their narcotic nature, there is a high propensity for addiction and abuse. Dr. MacKay, Dr. Stack, and Dr. Cannon were all using their patients’ addiction for selfish reasons.  Other doctors, however, are also over-prescribing these drugs, or improperly supervising a patient’s pain management regimen.  While this is not criminal activity, it is medical malpractice.  Negligent prescribing and monitoring of painkillers can cause serious personal injuries and give rise to medical malpractice claims.

Sometimes, careless physicians can transition patients from one narcotic painkiller to another, with disastrous consequences. For instance, Methadone is metabolized very slowly, and has a half-life of 15-60 hours. Additionally, it is fat soluble, and can remain in your system longer than other drugs. Likewise, OxyContin, a popular brand of oxycodone, is formulated to be released over time (the name is an abbreviation of Oxycodone Continuous release). When a patient is taken off of a “slow” drug and transitioned to a fast acting, instant release version, overdose can easily occur. The results of overdose can include respiratory arrest, anoxic brain injuries, or even wrongful death.

If you or someone you know has been over-prescribed painkillers by a doctor, you should contact a medical malpractice attorney immediately.  Our legal team has successfully handled many cases of medical negligence involving narcotics, and we can help you get the answers you need.  Call today for a free, no obligation consultation: 801-424-9088.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Medical Negligence and Keeping Secrets

Health Leaders Media recently reported that a startlingly high percentage of health care providers fail to disclose their errors due to fears of reprisal or retaliation.

As a medical malpractice lawyer, I’ve never understood why hospitals and health care corporations don’t just admit their mistakes and make the people whole.  They would put my colleagues and me out of business in an instant while drastically reducing malpractice costs, insurance premiums, and other expenses.

It’s almost like it is a big game to these corporations.  They would rather waste hundreds of thousands of dollars covering up mistakes and paying high priced defense lawyers hundreds of dollars an hour for years of litigation than simply admitting a mistake and paying malpractice victims a fair amount for their medical bills, pain, and suffering.

I just don’t get it…

–Ryan Springer

Posted in Hospital, News | Leave a comment

What About the Patient?

There is a great article up at the Huffington Post that discusses the emphasis on protecting insurance companies and negligent doctors without providing adequate protection for patients in proposed health care legislation.

Regardless of what side of the “tort reform” debate you find yourself, it’s worth a read.

Ryan Springer

Posted in Current Events, News | Leave a comment

Medical Malpractice and the Differential Diagnosis

One of the most common types of malpractice we see is physicians who miss a critical diagnosis.  Sometimes, this leads to delays in treatment which causes unnecessary pain and suffering and diminishes the chances for full recovery.  Other times, a missed or delayed diagnosis can result in permanent disability or even wrongful death.

In medical school and their residencies, doctors are trained in the “differential diagnosis.”  This is a routine diagnostic method whereby a physician formulates a hypothesis as to likely causes of the patient’s symptoms.  The doctor then uses his or her medical judgment to eliminate unlikely causes by a deductive process of elimination.

The essential component of the differential diagnosis is the use of reasonable medical judgment.  If a doctor eliminates a possibility simply because a condition is rare, that is not enough.  The judgment must be reasonable, and it must be based on the information available.  This doesn’t mean that doctors have to order every possible test to eliminate every possible disease–that’s not reasonable (and don’t worry–“defensive medicine” is myth).  But where a simple blood test or an inexpensive x-ray can eliminate a potentially fatal condition, it is reasonable to use those tests to reach a diagnosis.  Doctors and physicians are highly trained, and their patients trust them with their lives.

When doctors fail to exercise reasonable judgment and miss a diagnosis, that is medical negligence.  The law protects your rights to recover if you are a victim of malpractice, but you need experienced lawyers who understand the medicine and know the law.  Contact the Utah medical malpractice attorneys at G. Eric Nielson & Associates for a free, no obligation consultation today.

Ryan Springer

Posted in Misdiagnosis | Tagged , | Leave a comment